Candy, soda, pizza and other snacks compete with nutritious meals in nine
out of 10 schools, a government survey found.
Already plentiful in high
schools, junk food has become more available in middle schools over the past
five years, according to the Government Accounting Office, the investigative arm
of Congress.
"Parents should know that our schools are now one of the
largest sources of unhealthy food for their kids," Sen. Tom Harkin, who asked
for the study, said in an interview.
"Would anyone advocate that we take
the fences off the playground for elementary schools and just let kids run
around in the streets?" Harkin, D-Iowa, said. "By the same token, why would we
allow schools to sort of poison our kids with junk food?"
Obesity among
children and teenagers more than doubled in the past three decades, according to
the government-chartered Institute of Medicine. Obese kids will become adults
with chronic health problems, said Harkin, the senior Democrat on the Senate
Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee.
He and other lawmakers
want the government to set nutrition standards for food throughout schools and
not just in the cafeteria.
Giving kids healthier options "should not be
a suggestion, it should be a requirement," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.,
another committee member. Kids are suffering from higher rates of diabetes, high
blood pressure and other illnesses normally associated with adults, said Rep.
George Miller, D-Calif. At issue are so-called competitive foods —
snacks such as candy, soda, pizza and popcorn available in a la carte lines in
cafeterias, in vending machines and in school stores. Apples and milk are also
competitive foods, but the GAO said candy and other junk food crowds out
healthier stuff in vending machines and school stores. Competitive foods are
largely unregulated.
The Agriculture Department had restricted sales of
competitive foods until a 1983 federal court ruling, in a lawsuit by the
National Soft Drink Association, limited its regulation to food service areas
such as cafeterias during mealtime.
Schools raise substantial dollars
from selling competitive foods; 30 percent of high schools raised more than
$125,000 annually. The GAO said it was unclear how much competitive food sales
benefited school groups and how much benefited school food service.
The
GAO sampled schools that participate in the Agriculture Department's federal
school lunch program, which subsidizes school meals and regulates their
nutritional content. Those meals have to follow the government's dietary
guidelines, which call for eating more fruits, vegetables and whole grains and
less calories, fat, added sugars and sodium.
The GAO reported that of
656 schools in its sample, 51 percent of principals and school food directors
responded to a Web-based survey. Investigators also traveled to six school
districts that have tried to substitute healthier choices for less nutritious
foods. The survey's margin of error was plus or minus 15 percentage points.
The GAO report, scheduled for release Wednesday, found:
Nine in 10 schools sell competitive foods from vending machines, cafeteria a
la carte (snack) lines and school stores.
Vending machines were available in almost all high schools and middle
schools but in less than half of elementary schools.
In one-third of schools, sweet baked goods, salty snacks and other
less-nutritious foods were available in cafeteria snack lines.
Schools often sold competitive foods at lunchtime, in the cafeteria or
nearby, allowing kids to buy them for lunch or to supplement their lunches.
Three-quarters of high schools have exclusive soft drink contracts.
Sixty-five percent of middle schools have exclusive beverage contracts, up from
26 percent five years ago.